It would be stupid and blind do not agree

The Cyber thought during the last quarter of a century, has been impressive power, efficiency and sophistication. It is an important step in the order of the communication, in the field of the initial and in social well-being. Behind the screens hide all sorts of methods for the production, manufacture, distribution, consumption of goods, wares, images: as many dynamic mechanisms that have contributed to the general thrust of morals to speed or ease of relational contacts. It would be stupid and blind, do not agree.

Better than all theories political or ideological, the implementation of the canvas and networks has been radical mutations. All democracies, all advanced societies have incorporated this decisive material in their daily operation. from school to the workshop, the University farm, from the site to simple home cooking no inhabited space escapes the sovereign right of this technical know-how. And the application domain to conquer only demand that extend even further.

Who questioned the dynamic and positive effects of this mechanism across our societies Convergence of points of view, universality of vision beyond chips and magical boxes is a formidable consensus and some material success benefits appear significant.

Except for senior citizens! In the sloping vortex of our modernity cable or computerized this demographic slice does not participate in the banquet. A discrete exclusion, which broadcasts on a scale limited because this minority has no use of protest manipulation or television. It shows little in the parlementaires forums There is the weight of a contre-évolution among the people of a certain age a participation process moderate the flow of time. Public opinion badly like the description of a smooth discrimination. Discrimination is on the road allowances of General activity. Noisy motorcades, violent attacks, kidnappings capable of pointing the spotlight on a minority: this is common, frequent gestures. Seniors, take back and away therefore sacred perimeters where there is public debate.

Of course, cameras and scientific or journalistic investigations show willingly or retirement home that has a battery of keyboards and engages in communication performance. These are individuals who may come into contact with the world, their children and small-children for the good of all! In fact, access to new technologies remains the exception for senior citizens.

Let's not forget those who have no means of "controlling" properly these tools are on the bench because of their health, a lack of early learning of a urban removal... These people are more the "advantages" provided by Vanguard networks: preferential rates, promotions, delivery, purchase, sales, specific reservations. The sales and business contacts as well as administrative practices developing online, the phenomenon will go in a worsening. How do not see that this current new habits arise new dependencies Dependencies in addition to the other caused by illness, disability, physical impairment. Are we always in an ethic of equal sharing of resources, "open access" to the economic, cultural, monetary realities Moving a severe observation: the tranche of senior citizens, despite the great declarations, is abandoned by the wind in the history of the posttechnicité. It is an absolute limit to the illusions of modernity. No lobby, no party, no Parliamentary Assembly, no President, has the formal capacity of reverse this material block. It is a pretty cruel paradox! In a democratic, pluralistic society, it identifies a "discriminated" group - undocumented migrants, unemployed, intermittent, employees with precarious status, etc-, when above (imposed) marginalization was a concealed voluntary intention (economic, for example).

Here, this is not the case! It is the meaning of our collective embarrassment! Apparently is emerging difficulty no abusive or threatening behaviour! Person is responsible for this marginalization! The causes are diverse and touch on issues related to development, growth, urban development. How to curb such acceleration Is - this only "thinkable"

This social imbalance will be even more difficult to control that it is of no particular injustice, no relevant unfairness. Then a single recommendation is required: prior to exalt together on the techno-computerized prowess of tomorrow, should be, beforehand, to look on those sides and those who do not follow the pace! Those and those which do not have the same speed adaptation or progression. It would be a good start for the equality of the chances